Arthur your ignorance is apalling Go look at what ORCA does SAR doesn't give you the info With ORCA i have any thing from kstat or iostat. It goes into roundrobin database with rrdtool.
Procallaotr does for linux what orcallator does for solaris where it is the standard performance toool ------Original Message------ From: Arthur Corliss To: Dana Hudes Cc: module-authors@perl.org Sent: Mar 29, 2010 1:12 PM Subject: Re: Trimming the CPAN - "Automatic Purging" On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Dana Hudes wrote: > Orcallator, procallator and friends aren't shiny new toys > Adrian Cockroft wrote initial version of orcallator in the early 90s for his > book "Solaris Performance Tuning. The 2nd edition is I think 1998. > The current version of ORCA (processes the collected data) is from I believe > 2007 or so > www.orcaware.org i think it was I was being facetious. Your immediate dismissal of SAR is ill-advised. I'm wearing my abestos-lined boxers, so I'll lob this little inflammatory gem out there: if you're running a server (especially in production) and you're *not* running SAR, you're a freaking idiot. Profiling individual programs is all well and good for occasional or developer use, but the point of SAR is to give you a global view into the health of your system and to identify architectural bottlenecks. I think it would be greatly entertaining for Elaine or any of the other mirror operators to post their SAR reports so you guys can see the huge amount of abuse being heaped on their servers. SAR is debatably one of the lowest overhead methods of gaining that macroscopic view, and it still has profiling value on development systems when you're testing a specific workload. To ignore SAR is to show zero competence as a sys-admin. --Arthur Corliss Live Free or Die Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with Nextel Direct Connect