[sending this again, as it didn't seem to go through last time]
Frédéric Brière wrote:
3. What would be a more appropriate name for this module? I opted against Test::*, since this is not a test module per se. Would it make sense to move it into the IO::Tty namespace (IO::Tty::FakeDevice, maybe?), even though there's already a distribution by that name?
I think I'd use "Mock" rather than "Fake", in keeping with e.g. Test::MockObject, DBD::Mock, Test::Mock::LWP etc.
IO::Tty::MockDevice would seem to work for me. Cheers Dave P -- David Precious <dav...@preshweb.co.uk> http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/ www.preshweb.co.uk/twitter www.preshweb.co.uk/linkedin www.preshweb.co.uk/facebook www.preshweb.co.uk/identica www.lyricsbadger.co.uk "Programming is like sex. One mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life". (Michael Sinz)
