# from David Golden
# on Wednesday 08 April 2009 12:21:
>On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Eric Wilhelm <enoba...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> If there has been any controversy, it's been about the fact that
>> M::B was the first tool to break from "how we used to do it". This
>> exposed
>
>I'll add just my 2 cents to say that a good deal of the controversy
>was hung up on getting good support for Module::Build into CPAN.pm and
>CPANPLUS. Between the recent work on CPANPLUS::Dist::Build and the
>support for configure_requires in both CPAN.pm and CPANPLUS targeted
>for 5.10.1, I think the controversy will be largely resolved.
I would call that "a good deal of pain", rather than controversy. And
yes, thanks to your efforts (and to everyone else involved), that pain
is finally getting out of the way of progress.
Thanks,
Eric
--
Chicken farmer's observation: Clunk is the past tense of cluck.
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
