On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 07:11:12PM +0300, Burak Gürsoy wrote: > http://cpanratings.perl.org/user/dandv > > I wonder who created that page on perlfoundation.org? While it claims to be > the "community best practices" it even lists Module::Build as "maybe" I > think this page is mostly ridiculous. > > What do you think?
Dan can be overzealous, but I agree with almost everything that wiki page says. In particular, saying "maybe" for Module::Build seems pretty reasonable to me, since M::B vs. M::I is the emacs vs. vi of distribution installers, and the summary "there is controversy, but it's definitely better than EUMM" is certainly true. hdp.
