On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Eric Wilhelm <enoba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps we should charge by the pound for CPAN modules? Not > lines of code, but some kind of metric which appropriately conveys heft > (toughness/strength/finish are, of course, premium.) Executions without problem? That would be a hella software metric. The pie would have to get spread really thin to even bother with it. Maybe they made the wrong decision in '68 with regard to letting vendors charge for software. Better model: software is not a product; the service is the product. Software quality can (must?) be driven by liability concerns? -- "Nah, we straight."
