Hi sawyer x, thanks for your suggestion. On Sun, Jun 29, 2008, sawyer x wrote: > How about Exception::Easy ?
The idea to put it out of the Exception::Class name space is definitely worth considering because my module can in fact deal with any class that implements a throw method and I am planning to make it still more flexible in a future version. However, Exception::Easy sounds too much to me as if it would implement yet another exception framework which is not the case. I hope to find something more descriptive of what the module does. Thanks for your input, Lutz
