* Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-11 04:40]: > On Sep 10, 2007, at 11:53 AM, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > >OTOH maybe two adapter modules would work as well, one to let > >Log4perl-based code run under Log::Dispatch and one vice > >versa. (Do such already exist possibly? Or is there a > >fundamental problem with that idea?) > > It precludes a third logging backend from joining in the fun, > because for N backends you'd need N*(N-1) adapters.
Frankly, I see that as an upside. How many logging frameworks do we need? I meant fundamental problem more in the same of API impendance mismatch or suchlike problems that would prevent the concept from being practical at all. I doubt this is the case, but I don’t actually know Log::Dispatch so I can only guess. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>