* Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-11 04:40]:
> On Sep 10, 2007, at 11:53 AM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> >OTOH maybe two adapter modules would work as well, one to let
> >Log4perl-based code run under Log::Dispatch and one vice
> >versa. (Do such already exist possibly? Or is there a
> >fundamental problem with that idea?)
> 
> It precludes a third logging backend from joining in the fun,
> because for N backends you'd need N*(N-1) adapters.

Frankly, I see that as an upside. How many logging frameworks do
we need? I meant fundamental problem more in the same of API
impendance mismatch or suchlike problems that would prevent the
concept from being practical at all. I doubt this is the case,
but I don’t actually know Log::Dispatch so I can only guess.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Reply via email to