Xavier Noria writes: > But that's a good point, instead of requiring the user to pass [keys % > set] if he works with a hash, I could add a little sugar and accept > hashrefs in addition to arrayrefs. ... Also there'd be lack of > symmetry about the input and output structures...
Why? In the case where the user supplied a hash surely you could remember this and return the results as a hash too? Smylers
