Kurt Starsinic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>     The module is clever, but it's not clear to me that it's
> practically useful.

I think it could be useful if the new 'can' would only succeed on
public methods (note: not private ones, and also not on non-methods).
This would require a way to tag subroutines as being private a/o methods. 

-- Johan

Reply via email to