* _brian_d_foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-22 20:00]:
> It is completely different. A tool from CPAN is somebody else's
> idea of what your module distro should look like. Mine, not
> being a module starter tool, is your own idea. It doesn't know
> anything about modules other than what you tell it.
It’s the same thing insofar as both represent *someone*’s idea of
how the skeleton of a distro should be laid out. There’s valid
reason for both since some people aren’t as far along the curve
yet as to have their own ideas about that.
* Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-22 21:10]:
> I have to agree with this. Long before module-starter came
> along, I wrote a bash script which, using Template Toolkit,
> would build the shell of a distribution for me. It also
> managed source control, various utilities that I enjoy, and set
> things up just the way I like 'em for my environment. It would
> be nearly useless for anyone else.
Sure, but you and brian aren’t the kind of people who’d need h2xs
or module-starter or the like anyway. I find it kind of strange
to be telling people without enough experience to possibly roll
their own yet to do just that.
Regards,
--
#Aristotle
*AUTOLOAD=*_=sub{s/(.*)::(.*)/print$2,(",$\/"," ")[defined wantarray]/e;$1};
&Just->another->Perl->hacker;
