On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:40, Mark Stosberg wrote: > > The more I think about it DBIx would seem to be the winning > > place for this sort of thing. > > I understood 'DBIx' to be "DBI extensions", which is not what this is.
Correct. This module specifically uses tools provided with MySQL for managing administration (mysqladmin and mysqldump), and does not use DBI at all. However, there is no reason the basic concept could not be expanded such that others could provide similar backup managers for other database servers. Would Backup::MySQL be better, allowing for Backup::PostgreSQL, etc. down the line? Or should such things stay under specific server namespaces? [trying to catch up after being away all day] -- Sean Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Massachusetts General Hospital
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
