RE: Perl's Sacrifice Stone "Yves Orton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > However, no proper conceptual request has been made in PMD, with a thorough outline of what and how this should work. Ooopd, PMD! I missed that one. I know a module writer who is going to face an army of blow torches and pliers :-)
>Until that happens you are quite correct that no one in pmdev will put any effort in to it. > I for one find the idea interesting and possible a worthy addition to the monastery, but I would have to review the debate that has not yet occurred to come to any real conclusions. I really believe there is no need to change anything to the monastery. The only difference between a volontary review and a normal review is that the volontary review is in the answers not in the body. I also posted a normal message to draw attention to the volontary review going on. I was affraid that it might generate 2 or three reviews for a module and that would be a waist of time but it is refreshing to have multiple point of view. If a "Sacrifice Stone" (nice name isn't it? matches the offer plate quite well) proves to be a good concept, I'll be very happy to see it happend on Perl Monks. In any case the "Sacrifice stone" reviews should find their way to the normal review section. Cheers, Nadim.
