I'm 50/50 on this. Just because a module name mentions "Javascript" doesn't mean it would immediately be discounted by other developers. If people need something to handle Tooltips, they'll use it, or at least read the pod documentation.
Also, there are lots of other tooltip implementations out there in browsers. Some people implement tooltips purely in CSS. On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Pearce, Martyn wrote: > I am not convinced of this. As I read it, the developer using CGI::Tooltip > needs no Javascript knowledge; I think I would see CGI::Javascript::Tooltip > and immediately exclude it as I have no knowledge of Javascript. It should > be made clear in the docs of the module that javascript is required at the > client end, but clearly tooltips are meaningless without a gui, and very few > GUI browsers are not javascript-enabled. I'm all for meaningful names, but > they don't have to carry all the documentation in one line. > > Becky, this seems to me to be a very useful module. > > Mx. > -------------------- Christopher Josephes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
