Am 21.06.2011 um 18:12 schrieb Perrin Harkins: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Rolf Schaufelberger <r...@plusw.de> wrote: >> We are using Mason 1.x, a (little) modified version of MasonX::WebApp > > Us too! Glad to know someone else is using it.
Same to me, didn't hear from somebody else using it. When I started with it there weren't much alternatives, David Wheelers Interp::WithCallbacks or Maypole and that was it. > >> Currently, I can use on Perl instance in all virtual hosts or add a >> separate instance with +Parent for a virtual host. Yet , if I have some >> virtual hosts running with version A , some with Version B, some with >> Version C I have to add +Parent for each vhost and I,m running out of >> memory. So , I would like to make instance pools one for each version , and >> tell each vhost just, which pool to use. > > My approach to this problem would be to run separate httpd servers for > each version of the code you need to support and use a proxy in front > to do the dispatching. > > - Perrin yes, I've tried this too, but this leads to a big memory footprint too. If you have 10 sites and make separate (preforking) instance for each vhost, with StartServers = 2 and set the other parameters (Min/MaxSpareServers etc) to low values, you quickly get 20 oder 30 fat apache processes. Ok, you can get this running with enough memory, but the idea of instance pools seems to be a better and more elegant solution for this. I've discussed this once with Torsten Förtsch who is a mod_perl expert nearby, his opinion was, that it wouldn't be very much code that has to be added for this. Rolf Schaufelberger
