--- Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:54:37 -0700 (PDT) > "James. L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > mod_perl 2 seems solve the problem with virtual > host > > which will require us to adopt apache 2 and use > > virtual host. > > > > my understanding may be false but i would like to > hear > > your point of view and help me figure out the > problem > > we may have if we decide to use more Perl in our > > development. > > I would definitely go with mod_perl 2.x for the > reasons stated > previously. > > Also, just wanted to point out that you can > separate apps via > VirtualHosts in mp1 as well as mp2. There isn't > anything > new about that ability in mp2. > > I've got servers with probably 20+ different > small/mid/large > sized apps in the same Apache without issue, both > in mp1 and > mp2 scenarios. Largest app in that bunch is > around 50k lines of > Perl. > > With good coding practices it really shouldn't be > an issue.
any special setup for mod_perl 1 + apache 1 under virtual host? it works but my impression is that it is hard to setup and must be coded very carefully. that's probably the reason why i rarely see mod_perl offered in share dhosting environment. > --------------------------------- > Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://www.wiles.org > --------------------------------- James. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
