On 4/7/06, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 20:59 -0500, David Nicol wrote: > > Have you looked at DBD::Proxy and DBI::ProxyServer? > > That's not a pooling solution, and the performance is terrible. I'd > recommend just running fewer processes before resorting to DBD::Proxy. > > - Perrin
Oh. When I was trying to multiplex a single database connection to a room ful of clients that combination was reccommended to me by people on the DBI list. My work wound up being Http::Server::Singlethreaded. If I was to write a DBI multiplexer that simply serialized requests in order I would hope I was working against a database that could have multiple open result streams at once, otherwise entire result sets would need to come in in a serialized fashion, which would hurt response time a lot and take some kind of intermediate temporary storage. Disk would be appropriate. -- David L Nicol Should the bike shed have bunks? Or maybe cots?
