Issues, real life experience, regarding scalability of both in a
mod_perl environ would be extremely useful...
======================================================
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--Henry Spencer
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel McBrearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: mod_perl List <modperl@perl.apache.org>
Sent: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:19:51 -0500
Subject: Re: [slightly OT] Catalyst? Maypole?
Personally, I dislike RoR intensely - part from the language, part
from the implementation, and part from the cultish following that just
seems like a bunch of kool aid drinkers all too often.
Maypole and Catylst are both interesting, but I'm really not a fan of
all the automagic object relational stuff (which i think they share
with RoR). I think its great for small projects, but for larger things
I think it actually complicates stuff.
If you decide for a prepackaged framework and lean towards RoR, I'd
suggest checking out TurboGears first - its python (which is pretty
much a no brainer to pick up if you know perl), and I think its a way
easier to work with than RoR.
On Jan 20, 2006, at 10:29 AM, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been looking around at MVC frameworks a bit recently. RoR looks
> good if you don't mind the language switch, but I'm also looking at
> these two. Anyone have much experience of them, in tandem with
> mod_perl? Feedback and thoughts?
>
> thanks
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel McBrearty
> danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
>
___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com
