Thanks Perrin, that makes
more sense.
Although I agree the RPM is ancient, I've
been telling them that the real problem is they installed from RPM and now think
nothing could possibly be wrong as the RPM installed without an error
:)..
-Chris
From: Perrin Harkins
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 5:06 PM
To: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is mod_perl installed
Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 5:06 PM
To: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is mod_perl installed
On Thursday 19 May 2005 2:49 pm, cfaust-dougot wrote:
>
The box is RH enterprise and Apache and MP2 were installed via RPM
Well,
you know that's going to be a problem, right? That RPM is ancient
and
that version of mod_perl is no longer supported.
> So I guess
my question is, can it be said with 100% certainty that the
> "mod_perl
1.99xxxx" should show up in the error log (or those other
> documented
methods) if its installed and configured properly?
It's always possible
to change things in the source, but it seems very
unlikely they would have
done this for the error log message. More likely it
is installed but
not configured to actually be loaded when the server starts
up.
-
Perrin
