Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...] >> automatic per-request is definitely the way to go if we can do it - >> people just don't understand the unusual scoping of this field, so >> helping them along is probably best. > > sure, let's do that. It might also be nice to have this method croak in a non-prefork mpm. > Joe, would you like to merge in the code you've posted before or do > you want me to handle that? I can do it, but it'll take a few days for me to find the tuits. If it's easier for you to do it sooner, please feel free to handle it yourself. -- Joe Schaefer
