On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
This is different than the public signature of httpd installed in /usr/local/httpd. Is this signature with the mod_perl information only for private testing?
Right, this is due to to test of the $s->add_version_component() method:
My problem was not getting any mod-perl info at all, just the
httpd one, and was due to having the ServerTokens directive set.
I found out about this thru the docu on the above method.
I copied that info into a patch to
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/install.html
which I also sent to the docs-dev list.
I can't see anything posted there. I suppose the moderators aren't around to approve posts :( Just post it here in the future, or subscribe to that list before posting to it.
The value of this patch depends, however on whether ServerTokens directive is also in httpd 1! I don't know if it is or not.
--- install.html.orig 2004-10-03 13:25:13.000000000 +0800 +++ install.html 2004-10-03 13:30:32.000000000 +0800
Please take a look at:
http://perl.apache.org/contribute/index.html
to learn how to submit doc patches. HTML is not the source document, so your patch can't be applied. And make sure that you include the whole path and not just the final file, there is more than one install.pod in the tree.
Thanks Greg.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
-- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
