Dan Brian wrote:
Hi -

Is there a document (or person) with recommendations of using the libapreq (2) Perl modules versus the Apache::RequestRec/Apache::RequestIO approach described in all the perl.apache.org docs? Is libapreq a separate effort from mod_perl 2 and its Apache::* space? It's fairly confusing at this point whether there exist two different ways to use the Apache2 API, or whether one exists waiting for libapreq to catch up, how the apparently conflicting namespaces are managed, and so on. The organizations I work with who use mod_perl do so strictly with the libapreq interfaces (Apache::Cookie etc.), and I'm trying to get a handle on the direction of these efforts for migration preparations.

Could someone give me a pointer on where to focus?

From the mod_perl 1.0 land:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/performance.html#Apache__args_vs__Apache__Request__param_vs__CGI__param
And there was a report recently on the apreq-dev list, which shows an even better performance of apreq under Apache2.


--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html



Reply via email to