I think (at least from those I work with), that the main API docs for mp2 could fit them in (link to apache's libapreq site) as if they were a part of it... with notes below stating that they're from an external package. I'd agree with what I expect some responses to be, that people may be confused to see documentation about a product which isn't truely a part of 2.0 (is it supposed to be in the future?). Maybe give it its own section -- Part VI: Apache's libapreq -- http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/api/index.html
That's an excellent idea, Chad J. Joe, any chance A-R docs appear online so we can link to them from the above URL?
Actually I don't mind if they appear in the modperl-docs repository and be part of the mod_perl docs. But that means that they will need to be separated from apreq-2 package, in order to keep a single source. Then apreq-2 can check out the docs into the source, like we do with modperl-2.0/docs (which isn't really a part of modperl-2.0 repository, but a map to modperl-docs/src/docs/2.0
-----Original Message----- From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 6/19/2004 3:50 PM To: Kreimendahl, Chad J Cc: David Hofmann; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache::Request
Kreimendahl, Chad J wrote: > You're right. Looks like I was on a different (newer) machine when I > did a find for Request. Had only ever seen newer apache2/mp2/etc. I > checked around the perl.apache.org site and had a very hard time finding > documentation that would lead me to the url I posted below. I believe > it took google to get me there. > > Any chance in the 2.0 docs you can put a link to what looks like > Apache::Request and Apache::Cookie and just link them off to that url? Good idea, Chad J. I'm not sure where it the best location to do that. Ideas? > -CJK > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 6:09 AM > To: Kreimendahl, Chad J > Cc: David Hofmann; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Apache::Request > > Kreimendahl, Chad J wrote: > >>http://httpd.apache.org/apreq/ >> >>Install using one of the following methods: >> >>(easiest way) >>perl Makefile.PL --with-apache2-apxs=/path/to/apache2/bin/apxs >> >>(or, same thing, different method) >>./configure --with-apache2-apxs=/path/to/apache2/bin/apxs >>--enable-perl-glue --with-perl=/path/to/perl/binary >> >>(then, the standard) >>make >>make test >>make install >> >>This appears to install over top of the existing module, unlike >>installing in an Apache2 directory (like those of us who had mp1 and > > mp2 > >>running). So there may be problems in mp1 once this is done... I'd > > test > >>it, but my mp1 is long gone. > > > That's strange. I get it installed under Apache2/ subdir (assuming that > you > had mp2 installed into Apache2/ subdir). You may want to report all the > details to the apreq-dev mailing list. > -- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
-- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
