On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My 2 cents is that mod_perl lacks an "established" application server/tookits > so for a serious web application, programmers have to rely mostly on the original > API to get the full benifit. While there sevearl great application tools like > mason, ePerl, TT etc., yet, none of them is as "established" as php at the moment > (in the sense: easy to write, support, coder community, code samples etc.)
Uh, both Mason and TT have large active communities, lots of docs, books about them, code samples. ePerl is basically dead and all references to it should be abolished, since it only serves to confuse people. Perrin, maybe you could update your templating comparison article to remove things which have gone stale in the intervening years (ePerl & Apache::XPP, I think). -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/ -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
