On Friday 02 April 2004 03:18 am, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > Geoff, FYI - > > > > 'Patching' the APR_HAS_LARGE_FILES to 0 as described above did not work > > for me. Even with it set to 0 in apr.h the server seg faulted. However, > > using '--disable-lfs' DID work (and APR_HAS_LARGE_FILES did not need to > > be patched because it came out of the configure set to 0). > > cool. > > > Anyway, I'm a happy camper - and - tomorrow I plan to convert my > > production site to 2.1 and see how it goes. > > yikes. please be aware that while we do our best to make sure that any > issues mod_perl 2.0 has with Apache 2.1 are resolved fairly quickly, > officially Apache 2.1 is unsupported so you may be left in a lurch if you > run into problems.
yikes, youself, indeed! ;) Not to worry. I won't come crying when it dies - I'll just flip back to 2.0. My site is not that big a risk - low traffic - and I'm running all cvs devel packages on it already. Note - this is my little site, _not_ one of my clients'. I have always kept my site on the bleading edge so I have experience with the new packages when it comes time to install them elsewhere. At least with 2.1 running 'live' I can share with you and the 2.1 team any glitches I encounter (in a nice way). Aloha => Beau; -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
