Charles C. Fu (???) wrote:

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03 Mar 2004,
   Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

And why is the server *passing* the attachment?


W32/Bagle-K aka I-Worm.Bagle.j aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] aka WORM_BAGLE.GEN ...

Probably the fact that it's within an encrypted ZIP attachment (and
not always with the same encryption key) is interfering with ability
of some scanners to detect it.

We use amavis spamassasin + clamav at work - this works well.


Jacqui



--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html



Reply via email to