Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> You need the filehandle only if you use the temp file. In which case
> bbs are irrelevant. If you use slurp then there is are no
> filehandles. I think these are orthogonal.

Agreed- my earlier +1 was for both adding a slurp() method and 
marking the output as tainted.

-- 
Joe Schaefer


-- 
Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html

Reply via email to