Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> It looks to me like there may be a problem in apreq_cookie.c
> (it may not be computing the "expires" date correctly for Netscape 
> cookies).  Which version of libapr are you using?

If you're using the latest libapr, this patch to libapreq2
should fix the problem.

Index: src/apreq_cookie.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-apreq-2/src/apreq_cookie.c,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.20 apreq_cookie.c
--- src/apreq_cookie.c  26 Sep 2003 13:58:33 -0000      1.20
+++ src/apreq_cookie.c  18 Dec 2003 04:57:37 -0000
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
     if (!strcasecmp(time_str, "now"))
         c->max_age = 0;
     else
-        c->max_age = apreq_atoi64t(time_str);
+        c->max_age = apr_time_from_sec(apreq_atoi64t(time_str));
 }
 
 static int has_rfc_cookie(void *ctx, const char *key, const char *val)
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@
     return apr_snprintf(buf, len, format, c->v.name, c->v.data, c->version,
                         NULL2EMPTY(c->path), NULL2EMPTY(c->domain), 
                         NULL2EMPTY(c->port), NULL2EMPTY(c->comment), 
-                        NULL2EMPTY(c->commentURL), c->max_age);
+                        NULL2EMPTY(c->commentURL), apr_time_sec(c->max_age));
 }


-- 
Joe Schaefer


-- 
Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html

Reply via email to