On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 16:10 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > Hey, > > Is there any benefit in keeping per-vendor plugins installed as > separate .so files and loaded during runtime? > > Does anyone know of any out-of-tree MM plugin out there? I would bet > there isn't any as we truly haven't kept a stable plugin API like > never ever. > > Thinking of installed size, I believe we may end up duplicating a lot > of code when plugins share common code, as the utils libraries are > not > installed, they get incorporated in the plugins themselves. This also > makes some unexpected runtime errors if a plugin tries to register a > type that some other plugin has already registered (just had this one > today with the new Foxconn plugin in git master, which shares code > with the Dell plugin). > > What if we just simplify the setup and get all incorporated in the > daemon binary itself (for MM 1.14 for example)?
It seems OK, but what's the size difference of MM binary with no plugins, and with all plugins? Dan _______________________________________________ ModemManager-devel mailing list ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel
