Le 14 nov. 2010 à 21:04, E Chalaron a écrit : > Hello Bernhard > Thanks for the reply. >> That is a normal behaviour both programms use only one CPU/Core and are >> not multithreaded. >> > > Ok so if I understand properly does it mean that y4munsharp will get 1 > core and the yuvdenoise the oher one ? or both on 1 core that will > alternate from time to time ? > If so is there a chance that both (and maybe the other mjpegtools) can > be multithreaded ?
(hello, sorry I'm not english native) If I well readed your mail: you only have 2 core and you want some speedup but you have 4 processes : decoder, yuvdenoise, y4munsharp, ffmpeg The good hardware for this process will be to have 4 core (one for each process) Theorically, if you had more core/proc (than 4), you could add some threads more to the most consumming processes parts (aka yuvdenoise and ffmpeg enc) and to obtain some speed / optimizations But you don't have ;-) The most efficient way for me (empiric way) is not to distribute processes between so few cores, but to limit threads to the exact number of your processors. (was my 2 cents ;)) bye Hervé ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end client virtualization framework. Read more! http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
