On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Christian Ebert wrote:

> Hm, I played around a bit with the demo and am not convinced.

        I've done a lot more than play around with the demo and I am
        completely convinced ;)

> Especially with bitrate around 4500 to get a 2h video on a singel
> layer dvd, I get lots of square pixels with noisy material.

        You're supposed to denoise first ...

> Perhaps I haven't found the right tweakings, but so far mpeg2enc
> handles this much better.
        
        Not in my case - 4500 to 6000 with properly processed input looks
        far superior with Bitvice.

> BTW. is there a way to get the Luma Correction (gamma2.2) from
> mjpegtools (I'm encoding QuickTime files edited with Final Cut)?
> So far I've almost been using mpeg2enc, where/in which docs should I look?

        I have no idea what that's about.  Wasn't aware that any gamma
        correction is required if the chain of processing is setup right.

        If you're running FCP then you might also be interested in:

        http://www.mattias.nu/plugins/

        The temporal denoise filter ghosts too much in my opinion but the
        spatial filter does an excellent job of reducing noise.  And the
        price is right - free ;)

        if you have some money to spend then:

        http://www.cgm-online.com/eiperle/cgm_e.html

        is worth looking at (I have an earlier version of those)

        Cheers,
        Steven Schultz


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to