On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:

> on request of various people (hi Steven!), I've prepared a new

        Hi Ronald :)

> prerelease in the sourceforge release area, titled 1.6.3-rc2. This
> should at some point lead to the release of mjpegtools-1.8.0 or 1.6.3.

        1.8.0 would be fine unless there are strong feelings about calling 
        it 2.0 that could be done.  What would CVS go to after the release?

> Please report bugs on the -users lists; I'll try to prepare RPMs
> (source-RPMs and x86 ones for Fedora Core 4) during the next few days.

        Should jpeg-mmx go to 0.1.7?  There were changes made to allow it
        to be built shared and on win32.  Not as important as getting 
        mjpegtools-1.7.x (aka 1.6.3RC2 or whatever) pushed out though.

        Cheers,
        Steven



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to