On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Trent Piepho wrote:

> There is no need to do anything special for 720x480 instead of 704x480, you
> can use the same math.

        What about the difference in SAR between D1 and DV/DVD?  If it's not
        a fiction doesn't that need to be taken into account?  I have seen
        (in a couple different books and programs) 9:10 and 720x486 vs 720x480
        mentioned.

        If that's so then to get 720x480 you need to create the graphics
        at 720x534 and scale to 720x480.

        Pick up a book on FCP-HD or Adobe's "Premiere" (Photoshop even has
        a NTSC DV preset that uses 9:10 and 720x534).

> If you are going from a non-anamorphic DVD to a computer, the input SAR is

        He's going, as I recall from computer to DVD so it'd be from 1:1 to
        non-square.

        What does seem to be confusing me (perhaps others too)  is that there 
        is the SAR of 10:11 (ratio of 12.272727 and 13.5MHz) and the 
        "NTSC DV" SAR of 9:10 which is used by some fairly highend video 
        editors.

> If you are going from a non-anamorphic DVD to a computer, the input SAR is
> 10/11, and the output is 1/1.  The input height is 480 and the input width is

        Or 9/10 depending which book was last consulted :)

> 704 or 720.

        I'm not sure if fiddling with the numbers (if I put 720x528 in I can
        get 720x480 out) instead of padding 704 to 720 is the right thing to 
do.  
        If you look at a DVD created from digitizing a analog source you will
        PLAINLY see a 704x480 frame centered inside the DVD 720x480 frame!

> Want to scale vertically and get 720x480?  
> 480 / (10/11) * (1/1) = 528, use 720x528

> Want to scale vertically and get 704x480?
> 480 / (10/11) * (1/1) = 528, use 704x528

        Huh?  The same vertical size being used?   That's making the assumption
        that the 720x480 image is a 4:3 image and I thought that was not
        the case unless the SAR is 9:10!

        IF you have Wx480 being a 4:3 image then W can only be 704 for a SAR
        of 10:11.   Only way I see of getting 720 is to fudge things with the
        assumption that 720x480 represents a 4:3 image OR use a SAR of 9:10.

        Now IF you use 9:10 THEN you can get 720x480 from 720x534.

        Matt's page does make mention of the 720x480 frame not representing
        the 4:3 image - that's true for 10:11 but what about 9:10 which is
        a number I've seen used.  Wouldn't that make 720x534 -> 720x480
        the right thing to do?  Either that or pad 704x480 to 720x480.

        NOTE:

        If you look at a DVD created from digitizing a analog source you will
        PLAINLY see a 704x480 frame centered inside the DVD 720x480 frame! 
        It's done by padding, not scaling.

        It's all sooooo confusing! ;)

        At any rate there is the need for scaling - I think we can agree
        on that much at least. 

        Cheers,
        Steven Schultz



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to