On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Trent Piepho wrote: > There is no need to do anything special for 720x480 instead of 704x480, you > can use the same math.
What about the difference in SAR between D1 and DV/DVD? If it's not a fiction doesn't that need to be taken into account? I have seen (in a couple different books and programs) 9:10 and 720x486 vs 720x480 mentioned. If that's so then to get 720x480 you need to create the graphics at 720x534 and scale to 720x480. Pick up a book on FCP-HD or Adobe's "Premiere" (Photoshop even has a NTSC DV preset that uses 9:10 and 720x534). > If you are going from a non-anamorphic DVD to a computer, the input SAR is He's going, as I recall from computer to DVD so it'd be from 1:1 to non-square. What does seem to be confusing me (perhaps others too) is that there is the SAR of 10:11 (ratio of 12.272727 and 13.5MHz) and the "NTSC DV" SAR of 9:10 which is used by some fairly highend video editors. > If you are going from a non-anamorphic DVD to a computer, the input SAR is > 10/11, and the output is 1/1. The input height is 480 and the input width is Or 9/10 depending which book was last consulted :) > 704 or 720. I'm not sure if fiddling with the numbers (if I put 720x528 in I can get 720x480 out) instead of padding 704 to 720 is the right thing to do. If you look at a DVD created from digitizing a analog source you will PLAINLY see a 704x480 frame centered inside the DVD 720x480 frame! > Want to scale vertically and get 720x480? > 480 / (10/11) * (1/1) = 528, use 720x528 > Want to scale vertically and get 704x480? > 480 / (10/11) * (1/1) = 528, use 704x528 Huh? The same vertical size being used? That's making the assumption that the 720x480 image is a 4:3 image and I thought that was not the case unless the SAR is 9:10! IF you have Wx480 being a 4:3 image then W can only be 704 for a SAR of 10:11. Only way I see of getting 720 is to fudge things with the assumption that 720x480 represents a 4:3 image OR use a SAR of 9:10. Now IF you use 9:10 THEN you can get 720x480 from 720x534. Matt's page does make mention of the 720x480 frame not representing the 4:3 image - that's true for 10:11 but what about 9:10 which is a number I've seen used. Wouldn't that make 720x534 -> 720x480 the right thing to do? Either that or pad 704x480 to 720x480. NOTE: If you look at a DVD created from digitizing a analog source you will PLAINLY see a 704x480 frame centered inside the DVD 720x480 frame! It's done by padding, not scaling. It's all sooooo confusing! ;) At any rate there is the need for scaling - I think we can agree on that much at least. Cheers, Steven Schultz ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users