On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 07:24, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > I've found, and maybe others will chime in, DV very easy to work with - > you've got _1_ choice of frame size/quality/whatever, no worries > about field order (DV is bottom field first. Period), and the DV > converters seem to handle unsteady analog signals better than other > devices (which tend cause A/V sync issues when the signal is unsteady), > and so on.
Well, sync is built into the DV format. The problem with DV is, that it takes so much HD. Other than that, DV is a wonderful format, with no recognizable loss of quality, as opposed to MJPEG. Then again, most quality loss comes from the carrier (VHS, cable) anyway, so then DV doesn't help anything. ;). Ronald -- Ronald S. Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
