On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Marc Gregoire wrote: > Second, I don't have the original flower (it's not my picture), so I took another > image of which I do have the original to work > with. > This picture can be found at the following links: > Original: http://www.nuonsoft.com/temp/07_orig.jpg > Scaled: http://www.nuonsoft.com/temp/07_scaled.jpg > Mpeg2enc result: http://www.nuonsoft.com/temp/07_mpeg2enc.png > Commercial result: http://www.nuonsoft.com/temp/07_commercial.png > > Remarks about the above shots: > You cleary see that the 07_mpeg2enc.png shot is more blocky than the > 07_commercial.png. This is especially noticeable in the lower > left corner of the image. You can see block in the marble. You also see blocks in > the orange wall in the back. These blocks are not > visible in the commercial encoded result. The blocks on there own aren't that much > of a problem (I know that mpeg encoding works by > dividing the image into blocks), but the blocks show a clear discontinuity between > them.
No, I clearly see big color lost in output, produced by commercial coder.I made many tests, and results agree with Yours. Yes, mpeg2enc gives a little more blocky image. But mpeg2enc keeps all colors the same! Why do You think that color loss is not important? I prefer to keep colors and have a little blocky image than humble with color loss. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
