On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 06:36:30PM -0400, Selva Nair wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> 
> > > My capture card is a DC10+ under v4l - that's the resolution it
> > > captures at full size.  On my previous small project I used -d
> > > 2, but I think on this one I used -d 1 in lavrec.
> > 
> >     Yep - and DC10+ cards generate square pixels (or, if they can
> >     provide Rec.601 pixels then the drivers/software aren't
> >     requesting that format).  Thus the need to resample/scale to
> >     the DVD frame size.
> 
> Funny that it cant be convinced to deliver 704x576 or padded 720x576 
> frames.

If you go and acquire the chipset databooks from the mjpegtools
website and read into the capabilities of the video digitizer, you'll
find that the chip used in the DC10+ is capable of a max of 640x480
square pixels.  It (the video digitizer chip) was simply designed to
generate 640x480 square pixels, probably as a cost saving measure.




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to