>The reason is that we don't trust jpeg-mmx to be a fullblown replacement >for libjpeg - it still has some bugs that would need to be ironed out >before it could be released "into the wild" .-) > > Gernot Ziegler,
Hej, Gernot, Out of curiousity, how (and how much) does "jpeg-mmx" differ from the stock libjpeg? (e.g. how big would the diff be, and what files are involved?) What kind of housecleaning would it take to roll the changes into the upstream source code? -matt m. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
