On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 17:29, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > The first thought I had was to simply take lines 0, 2, 4, ... 720 > from the first frame and call that field 1, then take the corresponding > lines (0,2,4,...) from the next frame and call that field 2 and call > y4m_write_fields() with the two field buffers (and of course set the > rate code to "-F 4" (30000:1001)). Is this correct, or should I use > lines 1,3, 5 ... from the 2nd frame? Or will it make much difference?
I should think you would want lines 0,2,4 from frame n followed by 1,3,5 from frame n+1. That's how they will be displayed on your TV. Any other choice would introduce a mismatch in either time or space, albeit small. I would be curious if you can tell the difference though. Dan Scholnik ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
