Hallo > > Which version of the mjpegtools do you use ? > I am using mjpegtools-1.6.2 on a Gentoo Linux box. Ok.
> > > $ transcode -V -i o.rei.leao.avi -y mpeg2enc,null \ > > > -w 2800 --export_asr 2 \ > > > -F '5,-s -B 285 -V 230 -S 804 -4 2 -2 1 -q 4 -K hi-res -E -8 -R 0' \ > > > -o o.rei.leao.cd \ > > > -a 1 -b 224,0,5 --a52_dolby_off -J astat=o.rei.leao.cd.scl \ > > > -Z 480x368 -Y -56,0 > > I cant tell for the transcode command, but -S 804 and -B 285 should do > > the thing. > > Can you run it a way so the command trancode execute is shown ? > > transcode shows the command line used to call mpeg2enc. From > my log file I get: > > [export_mpeg2enc.so] cmd=mpeg2enc -v 0 -I 0 -q 3 -f 5 -4 2 -2 3 -b 2800 -F 1 -n n > -a 2 -V 230 -o "o.rei.leao.cd.m2v" -s -B 285 -V 230 -S 804 -4 2 -2 1 -q 4 -K hi-res > -E -8 -R 0 > > (Remember that when an option appears more than one > in the mpeg2enc command line, the latest one is > used.) I do not have to like what how transcode "extends" the options. > > I think transcode is doing something wrong because mpeg when you run > > mpeg2enc it splits by default a 700MB. > > You see this when mpeg2enc start in that 2 lines: > > INFO: [mpeg2enc] New Sequence every 700 Mbytes > > INFO: [mpeg2enc] Assuming non-video stream of 230 Kbps > > transcode adds the option "-v 0" to the mpeg2enc command line, > as you can see. Adding the "-v 1" option myself to mpeg2enc > command line (through the "-F" option of transcode), I can > see the following in the log: > > INFO: [mpeg2enc] New Sequence every 804 Mbytes > INFO: [mpeg2enc] Assuming non-video stream of 285 Kbps That lookes correct. > So the problem should not be with transcode, as mpeg2enc > knows that it should start a new sequence every 804 Mbytes. My problem is that mplex splits it exact at that point with you command. Where I set it (40MB) because I don't have such a large video arround. When you encode with -V 1 take a look at the last lines. If mpeg2enc sets a split point it starts to number that frame with 0, so the framenumber mpeg2enc prints out is much smaller than the aboslute number of frames. > Everything indicates that there is a bug in > mpeg2enc. Maybe the developers could take > a look. You can prove that by providing the framenumbers. And the mplex output. auf hoffentlich bald, Berni the Chaos of Woodquarter Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~gz/bernhard ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
