On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, James Finnall wrote:
> I am not sure about what the features and/or fixes might be in the .92 more
> current release. But this older version may do all that I really need for the
Quite a few fixes and features. But it sounds like that for your
purposes the improvements are not required.
> I am just doing some still photos to multiplexed with an audio stream for a music
> type
> of DVD I think is called DVD-A format.
wasn't aware of the name changing - DVDSP just refers to that as a
DVD with a slide show.
> Thank you and I would like to build the newer CVS version. But at the moment I
> do not really have two weeks to upgrade and rebuild all the packages on this
Shouldn't have to rebuild anything except mjpegtools. Once the
automake (and I'm convinced the torrent of errors mentioned all start
with one early error during the 'aclocal' run).
Two weeks? Must be a couple hundred packages to rebuild ;) I
remember doing a cold install and had everything recompiled and
running in a couple days (but only 30 or 40 packages/programs though).
As time permits perhaps you can try kicking automake into shape and
get the cvs version of mjpegtools going. On the other hand the
.93 release candidate should be up in a few days and that should have
all the auto* stuff already done.
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
