On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Andrew Stevens wrote:

> >     Well, I just encoded on a couple different platforms the clip that
> >     was uploaded to me and I can't seem to reproduce the artifacting.
> 
> Gaahhhhh just what we need.  Another Heisenbug ;-)

        Yep - can't have life getting too boring can we? <grin>

> Seriously, for stuff like this you almost invariably need the *precise same* 
> parameters and a similar platform as otherwise the numerics aren't identical.

        Very true.   I do have the precise parameters (they were in Richard's
        initial posting) as well as 30s of the data, and I do have an Athlon
        system.   The Suse 9.0 system uses gcc 3.3.1 and Richard mentioned
        his system (on which mpeg2enc was built) as having 2.95.3 - that's
        a significant difference and I suspect that will perturb the 
        experiment.

        I'll try the clip on the Athlon and see what happens but I suspect
        it'll look just fine.

        I did try the exact same parameters and when nothing unusual was
        seen I started experimenting to see if I could cause the artifacts
        to appear.

        The experiment wasn't a total waste though - I managed to come up
        with a proceedure that lowered the bitrate by 50% and produced 
        better output :)

        Cheers,
        Steven Schultz



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to