On 01 Feb 2003 13:47:58 +0100 Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which one will become the de facto standard? ;-). (I know you'll say > matroska, this is just rethorical ;-) ). OGM has a head start here. Many of the DVD ripping gurus (eg. alt.binaries.monter-movies) are using it with XVid/vorbis, even the Windows guys. > Face it: Xine doesn't support either of them, neither does Windows > Media Player. Don't know about mplayer, but since the last debian > flamewar I've given up all hope on that one[1]. Don't give up on MPlayer, it may not get an official .deb but it still works and many people are using it. It does play OGMs and in combination with Moritz Bunkus' ogmtools you can create them too. There are also DirectShow filters for playing OGMs in WMP. > Concerning tech. > details, I've only had a look on MCF some time ago, and OGM (though > I only glanced at it). I'll need to have a deeper look before I can > give an opinion on which of these I want to use (if any). They're > all interesting, but nobody needs 4 additional container formats... Surely that's only three :-) I believe the MCF spec is still not complete. OGM may not be completely specified either but it's out there and people are using it. Matroska may be the best long-term bet, but only if people think it better than OGM. Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
