Hey Brian, On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 01:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > That's actually an acronym for 4 words. ~ducking~ :-) But you are > indeed correct. Is there room in the MPEG specification to put MJPEG > frames into it?
I guess technically, you can do anything you like, but you'd want to use MPEG for 'normal' players to play it back correctly. If your player, however, knows what the recorder knows (i.e.: that it's actually MJPEG), then it's not hard at all. > I would think that movtar would work too wouldn't it? It's just a tar > file so nothing has to be done to "close" the file. MPlayer/MEncoder > would need a movtar demuxer, but that could be heavily borrowed from > the mjpeg-tools project. Well, libmovtar is a separate project, mplayer would fork that just as well. Anyway, OGM is actually much more interesting on the long run. Ronald -- Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux Video/Multimedia developer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users