each single part is unclear
2011/2/6 Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>:
> On 2011-01-27, ???? ??????? <chipits...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I tried to investigate a liitle...
>>
>> 2) my AS is 49675, 91.142.140.0/24 at location "A" and
>> 193.169.238.0/24 at location "B", there are announces on "rib"
>>
>> R0N0#bgpctl show rib | grep 49675
>> 91.142.140.0/24 87.229.147.182 100 0 31359 3216 8342
49675 i
>> 91.142.140.0/24 81.91.54.241 100 0 25086 12389 16083
49675 i
>> 91.142.140.0/24 80.78.109.138 100 0 16285 20485
>> 9002 16083 49675 i
>>
>> but no prefixes on "fib"
>
> what part of "bgpd doesn't currently support this" is unclear?
>
>
>
>>> On 2011-01-26, ???? ??????? <chipits...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear Sirs,
>>>>
>>>> we are running our AS in many locations (say AS65000)
>>>>
>>>> (location 1, AS65000, network n1.n1.n1.n1) <---- Internet --->
>>>> (location 2, same AS65000, network n2.n2.n2.n2)
>>>>
>>>> when we were running quagga, "allowas-in" made the work. otherwise
>>>> there was no route except default between two locations.
>>>> now we are replacing quagga with OpenBGPD, what is openbgpd's
>>>> equivalent of "allowas-in" ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ilya Shipitsin
>>>>
>>>> P.S. just to make sure - I already read manuals and somehow I didn't
>>>> find relevant information there. So, if all you can say is "RTFM",
>>>> please also say where exactly relevant information is located.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> bgpd doesn't currently support this.
