* Peter Hessler <phess...@theapt.org> [2011-01-30 22:23]: > On 2011 Jan 30 (Sun) at 19:04:50 +0100 (+0100), Henning Brauer wrote: > :* Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> [2011-01-30 19:03]: > :> I disagree, I think it is worth mentioning explicity - I have seen > :> a few people run into problems because they don't realise the implicit > :> rule is effectively "pass flags any no state". > : > :hmm. ppl should not rely on the implicit pass at all. > :last not least we put an explicit pass rule in the default pf.conf. > : > agreed, but this is a point of confusion for many.
is that really the case? that isn'y new behaviour, and I don't remember anything in that direction coming up before. my fear is simply that: the more we talk about this default pass behaviour, the more ppl might find it clever to rely on it. and that is bad. > The state law of Pennsylvania prohibits singing in the bathtub. wow. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
