On 11/02/10 04:25, Martin Hedenfalk wrote: > 2 nov 2010 kl. 03.08 skrev Hugo Osvaldo Barrera: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ldapd >> >> Caveats says: " ldapd does not fully work yet." >> >> Is this outdated? Is there any place I can find out exactly what >> DOESN'T work? > ldapd is not fully LDAPv3 compliant yet. For example, it does not yet support > all matching rules, most notably numericStringMatch and caseExactMatch. > > >> Also, should ldapd be considered stable for actual usage (I mean, not >> just testing)? > I've had no reports about stability problems. However, consider that 4.8 is > the first release where ldapd will get more widespread testing. > > You should follow ldapd -current, even if you're on 4.8. > > That said, I do encourage you to try it and send me reports. > > -martin
Thanks. I'll give it a try, and report if I have any stability issues. > >> Thanks, cheers! >> >> - -- >> Hugo Osvaldo Barrera >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMz3KGAAoJEIc88gcb++1EwYkIAJY538OOPIqOUFTRi8dijZV6 >> C2i7Gz1iK2Jw2ye2tHBO1SZx4q4YuVs8FP4hmy8IMXZfDqLEiIJcBLSuU3IBDgsH >> m/LRhyLJRdclmbO+1JUzYjjhfz+77NErAMeEc2gk6yxni0aNWhCYX1wTuXtcLHOm >> pgf9+Z9l7lPFQ6XSNDlvI4OR320M1J6sBUpkxKy6IgzHw+QrYuP2dr1NzhmLBBRf >> 7GE73gXgKqHK42hXjXH6rSI5ivPm2Ld5+rIYsyy8q27G56X9zkmGocfP1fc1FMHG >> T0/7lmzS9EA3hKweMHGaGqnlMHAbogCPJHMpTcNkJE5ML3uRKzo7x+k2Ak+0Nsw= >> =gs7H >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
