Hi! Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010-09-18, Imre Oolberg <i...@auul.pri.ee> wrote: > >> 3. using route-to ($if_ext $if_ext_gw) construct on the pass out rule i >> can't change the interface the packet it getting out, its already >> decided, i can only choose the next hop gateway address with-in the >> network the $if_ext is in >> > > not correct, you can change the interface. > > pass out to 8.8.8.8 user fred route-to (lo0 127.0.0.1) > > Right, it actually goes out thru the specified interface, i obviously did something wrong, doing it or observing the outcome, unfortunately i dont have the exact line what i used when experimenting any more.
But still i would like you to comment on a relevant observation (actually this experimenting was done on amd64 snapshot from around august 20 but also happens on i386 4.7 although it has many more rules). I have this setup for testing route-to rules ---|--------------------------------------------|---- | em1 192.168.1.195 _|_ 192.168.1.4 _|_ | | | | |___| |___| | 10.0.0.4 | default gw: 192.168.10.254 | em0 192.168.10.195 --|-----------------------|---- _|_ 192.168.10.10 | | (has a 'route add 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.10.195' static route) |___| and pf has three rules for two different traffics # traffic passing thru firewall pass in quick log on em0 inet proto tcp to 10.0.0.0/24 port 22 route-to ( em1 192.168.1.4 ) tag TEST pass out quick log on em1 inet tagged TEST nat-to 192.168.1.195 # traffic originating from with-in firewall itself pass out quick log inet user fred route-to ( em1 192.168.1.4 ) nat-to 192.168.1.195 And the observations are following 1. traffic passes thru all right 2. traffic originating from firewall itself delays first syn packet for about 6 seconds, then continues normally 3. if 3rd rule is deprived of 'nat-to 192.168.1.195' part, syn packet gets out instantly i.e. with-out 6 second delay (but this nat-to needs to be done or it has 192.168.10.195 source address while leaving em1) I admit that this setup presented here does not practically make much sense but i tried to extract from my firewall the essential parts pertaining to my so to say route-to thing. Imre