On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:07:47PM +0200, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Le mercredi 18 ao{t 2010 11:10:47, Gregory Edigarov a icrit :
> > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:07:58 +0200
> >
> > Henning Brauer <lists-open...@bsws.de> wrote:
> > > * Gregory Edigarov <g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua> [2010-08-17 09:29]:
> > > > Qmail??? Postfix??? "easiest to use"???? Oh, please don't... I would
> > > > even not give a dime to exim, which of the "big guys" I love the
> > > > most, in the terms of ease of configure. So now I definitelly see
> > > > OpenSMTPD as a very viable alternative.
> > >
> > > exim is also the one with 80s design (even sendmail abandoned that)
> > > and shit code.
> > > pretty much ANYTHING else is a better choice.
> >
> > Agreed. That left us to only the choice between sendmail/OpenSMTPD :)
> > I would definitelly advise for Opensmtpd, but not yet, at least not
> > before the 4.8 rel will be rolled, though in 4.7 it is quite stable,
> > and runs perfectly on a handful of my places.
> >
> > Meta1, which is viewed by some as a "sendmail made right" is still in
> > very deep pre-alpha state... what a pity.
>
> Have we yet an idea when it is planned for opensmtp to replace sendmail in the
> default install ?
>
> thanks,
>
> J-F
>
doubtful in a foreseeable future
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
