On 15 August 2010 01:06, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > On 2010/08/14 23:59, Eugene Yunak wrote: >> On 15 August 2010 00:16, Jiri B. <ji...@live.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 13:08:57 +0000 (UTC) >> > Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: >> > >> >> I'm occasionally working on a port of icinga which looks quite >> >> interesting (forked from nagios a while ago, it's still compatible >> >> but has diverged quite a bit now - many problems have been fixed >> >> and improvements made, in particular the UI has been totally >> >> replaced). Would have been done sooner, but despite its >> >> general crappiness and the many improvements that could be made, >> >> nagios actually works surprisingly well... >> > >> > There's another fork of Nagios - http://opsview.com/ - which looks they >> > gets huge list of enterprise users (just checking the web only). >> > >> > jirib >> > >> > >> >> Don't even bother to try - it's basically just a shitty web-frontend >> for nagios. It does not sort any of it's problems, and brings new >> ones. Did i mention it's shit and brings a lot of configuration and >> performance pain? > > heh, it wouldn't be the first time... icinga looks quite a different > thing, they do actually appear to be improving things. >
Sorry for the confusion, i was talking about opsview. As to icinga, i haven;t tried it myself but heard some positive feedback from a colleague of mine. -- The best the little guy can do is what the little guy does right
