On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:31:49 -0400 Rich Kulawiec <r...@gsp.org> wrote:
> Qmail is best-known among everyone equipped with sufficient experience > as the cause of numerous operational issues and a fair amount of abuse > thanks to a number of very poor design and implementation decisions. > Many of these have been discussed over the year in exhaustive detail > on the appropriate mailing lists and newsgroups. Anyone who isn't > fully aware of this simply hasn't been paying attention. > > ---Rsk > I suppose your also aware of the sites that show that much of this rhetoric is complete bullshit, these happen to back it up with fact rather than making sweeping unsupported or incorrect statements. I asked you for examples, give me an example that isn't covered by the spamcontrol patch at fehcom.de. One thing which is debateable for hours is smtp connections and verps which is why an rfc can't be decided upon (performance (for spammers too) vs functionality). qmail has taught other MTAs far more than any other MTA has taught qmail.
