* Eugene Yunak <e.yu...@gmail.com> [2010-08-10 15:05]:
> Definitely nagios/cacti pair or zabbix. Having used nagios for a year
> or so, i would never want to get back to Tivoli. It also gives you
> lots of flexibility in how you setup your monitoring, and can neatly
> work with snmp as well.

anyone using nagios and neat in the same sentence without negation
must also enjoy beating his head against a wall.

nagios is shit. misdesigned, horrible code, and someone who obviously
doesn't understand blocking semantics of sockets writing that part of
the code...

that said, I use it, too. and as almost every other serious user with
at least a little bit of standards left I hate it.

the old, trivial, mon package we used before just didn't cut it any
more, had its own share of problems and wasn't fix- and extendable
with reasonable effort, and there were no other options but nagios
back then. and since it took us almost a year to switch over I am not
looking forward to do it again. I am not even sure there is anything
at least halfway good out there today.


-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting

Reply via email to